Last data update: May 06, 2024. (Total: 46732 publications since 2009)
Records 1-5 (of 5 Records) |
Query Trace: Ronaghi M[original query] |
---|
Testing the shock protection performance of Type I construction helmets using impactors of different masses
Wu JZ , Pan CS , Ronaghi M , Wimer BM . Biomed Mater Eng 2024 BACKGROUND: Wearing protective helmets is an important prevention strategy to reduce work-related traumatic brain injuries. The existing standardized testing systems are used for quality control and do not provide a quantitative measure of the helmet performance. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the failure characterizations of Type I industrial helmets and develop a generalized approach to quantify the shock absorption performance of Type I industrial helmets based on the existing standardized setups. METHODS: A representative basic Type I construction helmet model was selected for the study. Top impact tests were performed on the helmets at different drop heights using two different impactor masses (3.6 and 5.0 kg). RESULTS: When the helmets were impacted with potential impact energies smaller than the critical potential impact energy values, there was a consistent relationship between the peak impact force and the potential impact energy. When the helmets were impacted under potential impact energies greater than the critical potential impact energy values, the peak impact forces increased steeply with increasing potential impact energy. CONCLUSION: A concept of safety margin for construction helmets based on potential impact energy was introduced to quantify the helmets' shock absorption performance. The proposed method will help helmet manufacturers improve their product quality. |
Encumbered and Traditional Anthropometry of Law Enforcement Officers for Vehicle Workspace and Protective Equipment Design
Hsiao H , Whisler R , Weaver D , Hause M , Newbraugh B , Zwiener J , Ronaghi M , Bradtmiller B , Rockwell B , McDougall V , Brake T . Hum Factors 2021 66 (1) 187208211064371 OBJECTIVES: This study investigated anthropometric changes of national law enforcement officers (LEOs) in 46 years, compared the differences between LEO data and civilian anthropometry, and identified the magnitude of differences in dimensions measured with gear versus semi-nude measurements. BACKGROUND: The best available 46-year-old anthropometric dataset of LEOs has largely become outdated due to demographic changes. Additionally, anthropometric data of female LEOs and LEO measurements with gear are lacking. METHOD: Thirty-four traditional body dimensions and 15 with gear measurements of 756 male and 218 female LEOs were collected through a stratified national survey using a data collection trailer that traveled across the U.S. and the data were compared to the LEO anthropometric data from 1975 and existing civilian anthropometric databases. RESULTS: LEO body size and shape have evolved over the past 46 years - an increase of 12.2 kg in body weight, 90 mm in chest circumference, and 120 mm in waist circumference for men. No previous data was available for comparison for females. Compared to civilians, both male and female LEOs have a larger upper body build. LEO gear added 91 mm in waist breadth for men and 120 mm for women, and 11 kg in weight for men and 9 kg for women. CONCLUSION: The study reveals that equipment design based on the existing civilian datasets or 46-year-old LEO dataset would not accommodate the current LEO population. The new data fill this gap. Application: The differences reported above are important for LEO body gear, vehicle console, and vehicle ingress/egress design. |
Application of polyethylene air-bubble cushions to improve the shock absorption performance of Type I construction helmets for repeated impacts
Wu JZ , Pan CS , Ronaghi M , Wimer BM , Reischl U . Biomed Mater Eng 2020 32 (1) 1-14 BACKGROUND: The use of helmets was considered to be one of the important prevention strategies employed on construction sites. The shock absorption performance of a construction (or industrial) helmet is its most important performance parameter. Industrial helmets will experience cumulative structural damage when being impacted repeatedly with impact magnitudes greater than its endurance limit. OBJECTIVE: The current study is to test if the shock absorption performance of Type I construction helmets subjected to repeated impacts can be improved by applying polyethylene air-bubble cushions to the helmet suspension system. METHODS: Drop impact tests were performed using a commercial drop tower test machine following the ANSI Z89.1 Type I drop impact protocol. Typical off-the-shelf Type I construction helmets were evaluated in the study. A 5 mm thick air-bubble cushioning liner was placed between the headform and the helmet to be tested. Helmets were impacted ten times at different drop heights from 0.61 to 1.73 m. The effects of the air-bubble cushioning liner on the helmets' shock absorption performance were evaluated by comparing the peak transmitted forces collected from the original off-the-shelf helmet samples to the helmets equipped with air-bubble cushioning liners. RESULTS: Our results showed that a typical Type I construction helmet can be subjected to repeated impacts with a magnitude less than 22 J (corresponding to a drop height 0.61 m) without compromising its shock absorption performance. In comparison, the same construction helmet, when equipped with an air-bubble cushioning liner, can be subjected to repeated impacts of a magnitude of 54 J (corresponding to a drop height 1.52 m) without compromising its shock absorption performance. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the helmet's shock absorbing endurance limit has been increased by 145% with addition of an air-bubble cushioning liner. |
Application of air-bubble cushioning to improve the shock absorption performance of type I industrial helmets
Wu JZ , Pan CS , Ronaghi M , Wimer BM , Reischl U . Eng Fail Anal 2020 117 104921 The industrial helmet is the most used and effective personal protective equipment to reduce work-related traumatic brain injuries. The Type I industrial helmet is a basic helmet model that is commonly used in construction sites and manufacturers. The purpose of the current study was to investigate if shock absorption performance of these helmets could be improved by using an air-bubble cushioning liner to augment the helmet's suspension system. Drop impact tests were performed using a commercial drop tower test machine according to the ANSI Z89.1 Type I drop impact protocol. Typical off-the-shelf Type I industrial helmets were utilized in the study. The effects of the air-bubble cushioning on the helmets' shock absorption performance were evaluated by comparing the original off-the-shelf helmet samples to the helmets equipped with an air-bubble cushioning liner. The air-bubble cushioning liner (thickness 5 mm) was placed between the headform and the helmet when being tested. The impactor had a mass of 3.6 kg and was free-dropped from different heights. The maximal peak transmitted forces for each of the tests have been evaluated and compared. Our results show that the shock absorption effectiveness of the air-bubble cushioning is dependent on the magnitude of the impact force. At lower drop heights (h < 1.63 m), the air-bubble cushioning liner has little effect on the transmitted impact forces, however, at higher drop heights (h>/= 1.73 m) the air-bubble cushioning liner effectively reduced the peak transmitted forces. At a drop height of 1.93 m (the highest drop height tested), the air-bubble cushioning liner reduced the peak transmitted force by over 80%. Our results indicate that adding an air-bubble cushioning liner into a basic Type I industrial helmet will substantially increase shock absorption performance for large impact forces. |
ROPS performance during field upset and static testing
Harris JR , McKenzie Jr EA , Etherton JR , Cantis DM , Ronaghi M . J Agric Saf Health 2010 16 (1) 5-18 Agriculture remains one of the most hazardous occupations in the U.S. By conservative estimates, tractor overturns alone claim 120 lives annually. A rollover protective structure (ROPS) and a seatbelt are a highly effective engineering safety control that can prevent many of these fatalities and reduce the severity of injuries associated with tractor overturn. SAE J2194 is a consensus performance standard established for agricultural ROPS. According to this standard, satisfactory ROPS performance can be demonstrated through static testing, field upset testing, or impact testing. A previous modeling study suggested that static testing may underpredict the strain induced in a ROPS during a field upset. In the current study, field upset testing and laboratory static testing results were compared. Field upset testing included six rear and six side upset tests performed according to SAE J2194 guidelines. Additionally, static testing was performed on a ROPS of the same model. The results support findings from the modeling study. Near the lowest sections of the ROPS, the plastic strain resulting from rear upset testing exceeded the plastic strain from static testing for 18 of 24 data points. Conversely, the ROPS plastic strain from side upset testing was typically less than plastic strain from laboratory static testing. However, data indicate that the side upset test may not be very repeatable. This study suggests that the longitudinal loading energy criterion for static testing might not be a conservative predictor of rear upset ROPS response. |
- Page last reviewed:Feb 1, 2024
- Page last updated:May 06, 2024
- Content source:
- Powered by CDC PHGKB Infrastructure